Jeff Epler wrote: > Here is the stuff I think we should remove unless someone is interested > in maintaining it. I say this as a way to open discussion, not as a > final decision. > > > * at_pid > - do we have any success stories of at_pid used in tuning? > - everything else but tuning is the same as pid, but maybe out of date > > If there is any hope of saving this carcass, I'd like to see it hang around. Maybe we can take another crack at it at the Fest. I've wanted to get into the PID a bit, anyway, to see if I could add a LP filter to the D term.
Jon ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
