I do not know if this is what they did, however, this functionality can be migrated out to a preprocessor (ie. NURBS->arcs, but I would also add lines which would make them something different than biarcs). Do you see a problem with that?
EBo -- Jeff Epler <[email protected]> said: > On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 09:23:13PM -0500, Chris Radek wrote: > > Also, I don't see why nurbs/splines > > shouldn't work with cutter comp (it is disabled explicitly). Probably > > just some slight tweaking is needed for both these problems. > > If I correctly recall the design, the NURBS are passed through canon > calls to task, and then task converts the NURBS to biarcs. In this > scheme, interp never sees the arcs so it can't offset them, and nobody's > written new code to offset NURBS directly. > > Jeff ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Stay on top of everything new and different, both inside and around Java (TM) technology - register by April 22, and save $200 on the JavaOne (SM) conference, June 2-5, 2009, San Francisco. 300 plus technical and hands-on sessions. Register today. Use priority code J9JMT32. http://p.sf.net/sfu/p _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
