I don't personally want or need this, but if the feature works right I
don't have an objection.
I noticed a few things about the proposed patch:
+ CHKS((!_readers['x'] || !_readers['y']), _("Cannot read polar coordinate
on a machine lacking X or Y axes"));
one natural thing to do might be to extend this to all the different
planes. If not adding this right away, maybe the @< notation should be
rejected for now when not in G17 so that it never changes the meaning of
a future program.
I also missed the code which makes code like
@2.5<140 X0 Y0
an error; this is nonsense code, right?
Jeff
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community
Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support
A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy
Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
