Chris Radek <[email protected]> said: > I do understand this math. I don't understand how it's relevant to > this particular change. > > I'm just proposing a shorthand for writing R,T in gcode in places > where X,Y would normally go. Maybe you are thinking of a much > larger proposal than mine?
It is more likely that I have not completely thought through your proposal. I'll have to read through the code and see how you are going about implementing it, but yes I was thinking about a general solution. Then again I am not sure where I was going with the thought would be the best way about it. So you are looking at simply replacing x,y with r,t? I see it now. I'll have to think about this a little once I get a little sleep (hint ;-) Catch you tomorrow. EBo -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
