> >> Here is the patch to make NURBS_FEED to take line_number from interpreter. > >> This fixes a total break of NURBS, so they somehow work again. > > > I have not been keeping abreast of the NURBS issues. Were the previous > > questions about scaling and transformations related to NURBS? Also, is the > > changes to the NURBS you are referring to the bi-arc approximation or has > > someone added a full NURBS basis? Depending on the answer to these > > questions > > I might be able to suggest some solutions or even possibly hack some > > together. > > The scaling and transformation can be done by simply transforming the > > control > > nodes (IIRC). > > As I understand the code is as you have left it. Chris made a change, > which forbidsmoves with zero id, thus my patch makes all NURBS functions > to supply correct non-zero id. It does not change any mathematics, > so it is as broken as it was.
What little I contributed to that code base was simply importing someone elses code (unfortunately I forget whose at the moment, but I think I documented it on the wiki) to the most recent version of EMC. I did nothing to the base code in part because it was a bi-arcs approximation and not a native NURBS. I doubt that anything I suggested above would work directly on the control points unless you modified the control and reaproximated the curve. That should work. I'll try to take a look at the current code base and see if the problem I was having has been solved with excluding zero id's. EBo -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Download Intel® Parallel Studio Eval Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance. See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta. http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
