On 24 June 2010 15:03, Neil Baylis <[email protected]> wrote: > b) You changed the memory layout, and corruption (e.g. due to > wild pointer) that was occurring at a vital location is now occurring at an > innocuous location.
This has been my working hypothesis, but I have looked and looked at my code and not spotted the wild pointer yet. But then, I wouldn't, as I find pointers baffling (I have spent the last several years working with a pass-by-reference language) -- atp ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ThinkGeek and WIRED's GeekDad team up for the Ultimate GeekDad Father's Day Giveaway. ONE MASSIVE PRIZE to the lucky parental unit. See the prize list and enter to win: http://p.sf.net/sfu/thinkgeek-promo _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
