On 3 May 2012 21:37, Jan de Kruyf <[email protected]> wrote: > 4. So I would vote to revert to a release before you disabled the faulty > code, and publish a formal warning from the directors of the project on the > users list.
I don't think this is the way to go. Nobody should be doing anything that "matters" on the development version of LinuxCNC which is the only place where this change currently exists. The 2.5 release still works as it always has (and has the possibility of the out-of-order execution that Michael spotted) -- atp The idea that there is no such thing as objective truth is, quite simply, wrong. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
