This is exactly why I asked for references so we could look at the 
mathematical definitions and either experiment with working machines or 
at least develop a simulation model which stress tests the various 
aspects of the two approaches.  I would rather a fully principled 
approach to this (including reviewing the math) than the current list 
thread direction.

On Thu, 1 Nov 2012 05:47:00 -0700 (PDT), Peter C. Wallace wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Nov 2012, andy pugh wrote:
>
>> Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2012 11:23:09 +0000
>> From: andy pugh <[email protected]>
>> Reply-To: EMC developers <[email protected]>
>> To: EMC developers <[email protected]>
>> Subject: Re: [Emc-developers] ferror calculation incorrect in motion
>>
>> On 1 November 2012 06:51, EBo <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> OK Now the question is should the ferror be calculated based on the
>>> current encoder position, or the PID on the previous position?
>>>
>>
>> The PID error has a well-defined meaning, and is the difference 
>> between the
>> current command position and the current feedback position.
>> This will, of necessity, be non zero during any active control. 
>> (Because if
>> PID error is zero, PID output is zero).
>
> Not quite true, imagine a well tuned velocity servo running at a high 
> speed
> (with FF1 supplying most of the PID output and the integral term
> making up the
> rest) this PID loop will have a nearly 0 error between the command 
> and
> feedback (thats its job! and consider that any integral term will 
> force the
> error to 0 eventually during a long slew)
>
> So here we have a well tuned PID loop doing what its asked 
> (minimising the
> error it sees) but ferror is not calculated using the same command 
> and
> feedback so will show a error proportional to velocity (its 
> calculated from
> the current feedback but the previous commanded position)
>
> This makes accurate tuning difficult as now the PID loop has to be 
> tuned
> to minimize command-feedback-velocity*sampletime rather than just
> command - feedback. So now if you have any integral term so the PID
> error gets
> forced to zero: you now have a large ferror
>
>>
>> I am not sure that the current f-error calculation is wrong. There 
>> was a
>> new command position. The system moved for a servo period. The 
>> f-error is
>> how closely the new position matched the commanded position.
>>
>> PID-error looks forward, f-error looks backwards.
>
> Thats fine but they both should look at
>
>>
>> I think the aim is to reduce F-error rather than PID error, because 
>> PID
>> error is what makes PID output.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to