On Thu, Nov 1, 2012, at 01:36 PM, Peter C. Wallace wrote:

> 
> Yes ferror is used:
> 
> 1. For tuning (badly since 0 ferror is not 0 pid error when in motion)
> 2. for servo fault detection (too large a ferror causes a fault)
> 

Strictly speaking, ferror is used within LinuxCNC only for #2.

For tuning, the human tuner chooses to probe some pin with halscope. 
Peter is assuming they choose the ferror pin (and that is a reasonable
assumption).  But it isn't hard-coded that way - they could choose to
probe the PID block's error pin, which would give Peter exactly what he
wants.

I still think that for #2, servo fault detection, it makes sense to
compare the measured position with the last position that the PID loop
was asked to go to.  The alternative is to compare the measured position
with a target position that the PID loop hasn't even seen yet.  How can
you expect the PID loop to follow a command that it hasn't seen?

Of course, the answer to that is "that's what FF1 is for".  By using
FF1, the PID loop is essentially assuming that the machine will keep
moving at the same direction and speed that it was before - so it can
anticipate the next position, even though it hasn't seen it yet.  And as
Peter points out, when properly tuned it can arrange to be at that
position just as the command arrives.  Things probably get a bit more
interesting when the machine doesn't keep going at the same direction
and speed it was before...

I think the right answer might be keep the ferror calculation as is, and
to tell people to use the PID loop error pin for tuning.  But I'm not
going to get excessively bent out of shape if someone changes the motion
module so that it calculates ferror using the new command rather than
the old one.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Everyone hates slow websites. So do we.
Make your web apps faster with AppDynamics
Download AppDynamics Lite for free today:
http://p.sf.net/sfu/appdyn_sfd2d_oct
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to