On Wed, Nov 21, 2012, at 09:18 AM, EBo wrote: > I'm not on the board, but my 2c is LGPL (most expansive possible 0.1+) > all libraries, and GPL (0.1+) all high level interfaces. Them's my 2c > > I would not suggest tabling the code writing, but you are correct -- > the licensing issue needs to be addresed, and frankly I thought it had > been addressed properly already... > > So, if you start with hal... Find the author(s) and make sure that a > 2+ is OK. Working on that can continue as work on the code is > continuing (that is unless you think you need to scrap the hole lib and > start over)... >
I'm the original author of HAL, but there have been many others over the years. I'm OK with LGPL 2+ for public interfaces and GPL 2+ for code. But as I understand it, all the contributors would have to agree. I am not a license lawyer and I have no intention of ever becoming one. This email is about as deep as I want to get in that area. Regards, John Kasunich ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
