Seb,

Am 03.09.2013 um 22:07 schrieb Sebastian Kuzminsky <s...@highlab.com>:

> On 9/3/13 11:47 , John Morris wrote:
>> On 09/03/2013 09:44 AM, Sebastian Kuzminsky wrote:
>>> * The 'master' branch on git.linuxcnc.org will become 2.6 in the future,
>>> after the fate of two outstanding feature branches is determined.
>>> 
>>> * The first feature branch is joints_axes3.  It's currently undergoing
>>> refinement for merging into master.
>>> 
>>> * The other feature branch is unified-build-candidate-2.  It's currently
>>> awaiting review from the wider development community.
>>> 
>>> * Once those two merges happen, or we've decided to postpone them, we'll
>>> branch 2.6 off master.
>> 
>> This is the second time I've read that you or Chris see UB/RTOS not
>> getting into the 2.6 release as a possibility.  Can you clarify what
>> sort of scenario you envision where this could be a realistic outcome?
> 
> I am very hopeful that the new RTOS work will make it into master before 
> we fork 2.6.

Well branches dont make it into releases by themselves, so I think the next 
step would be a list of action items to break down the task and make it happen

I surely will fix known issues or document better when that is found lacking - 
unsure how to fix a trepidation though, in particular if it's not filed in the 
tracker ;)

suggestion to get the process going: what about tagging/adding the issues you'd 
consider 'must fix', 'nice to have' etc in the github tracker with (a) new 
label/s, then it's straightforward to followup and get the boxes ticked

- Michael 


> 
> My only trepidation comes from the massive infusion of change at the 
> very end of the development cycle.  The merge of ubc will push out the 
> 2.6.0 release quite a bit, because I want lots of runtime on the branch 
> before i call it "stable" and release it to users.
> 
> The scenario i've been thinking of where ubc isn't part of 2.6 would 
> have us fork 2.6 pretty much as master is now (possibly with ja3 merged 
> since it's about 1/10 the size of ubc and contains only one logical 
> change instead of the half-dozen or so changes in ubc).  Then right 
> after the 2.6 branch we'd merge ubc into master for 2.7.  In this 
> scenario I'd aim for a much shorter release cycle for 2.7, basically 
> just enough to stabilize ubc.
> 
> But I think the likelier scenario is that we merge ja3 and ubc in the 
> next month or two, deal with the build infrastructure changes etc, and 
> start making 2.6 pre-releases to encourage testing before the release.
> 
> I know how hard you've worked on ubc and how valuable the features 
> you've implemeted are, and i really want to get that value out to our 
> current users and to all the new users that ubc enables.
> 
> 
>> I hope the community agrees the UB/RTOS work's feature of greatest
>> importance is the possibility of packaging an RT-enabled LinuxCNC for
>> the big distros for the first time.  The 2.6 release is the first and
>> last chance in the foreseeable future to give UB/RTOS the official
>> status under the project required for submission to the distros.  It
>> would be a tremendous setback to miss this opportunity.
> 
> The greatest benefit i see in the UB branch is support for more RT 
> kernels and the additional binary architectures that come with that. But 
> i see that other people highly value the possibility of getting into 
> popular distros like Debian and Red Hat, and understand the appeal of 
> that too.
> 
> 
> -- 
> Sebastian Kuzminsky
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more!
> Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies
> and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step
> tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save!
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58040911&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-developers mailing list
> Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn the latest--Visual Studio 2012, SharePoint 2013, SQL 2012, more!
Discover the easy way to master current and previous Microsoft technologies
and advance your career. Get an incredible 1,500+ hours of step-by-step
tutorial videos with LearnDevNow. Subscribe today and save!
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=58041391&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to