On 29 September 2013 01:07, Chris Radek <[email protected]> wrote: > Robert, thanks for your interest; I am working on digesting your > paper.
The idea of basically building the current trajectory then iteratively improving it seems interesting. It may be worth considering working only on a "patch" of moves that encompasses the distance required to stop in. Something else that would be useful would be to be able to run the motion backwards (EDM) , so keeping the already-completed moves in memory might be useful too. -- atp If you can't fix it, you don't own it. http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ October Webinars: Code for Performance Free Intel webinars can help you accelerate application performance. Explore tips for MPI, OpenMP, advanced profiling, and more. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register > http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60133471&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
