On 10 November 2013 08:14, Michael Haberler <[email protected]> wrote: > I've written up an initial requirements document for the future LinuxCNC > middleware which is to replace NML/RCS.
I am curious what you think is wrong with NML/RCS. I am not arguing that there isn't anything wrong with, it I am just wondering what the "issues list" is. > > http://static.mah.priv.at/public/wip/html/wip/requirements.html#_configuration_requirements I don't see anything wrong with the requirements, but then I am not sure I know enough about the issues. (see my first question) -- atp If you can't fix it, you don't own it. http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ November Webinars for C, C++, Fortran Developers Accelerate application performance with scalable programming models. Explore techniques for threading, error checking, porting, and tuning. Get the most from the latest Intel processors and coprocessors. See abstracts and register http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=60136231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
