On 01/12/2014 09:12 AM, Charles Steinkuehler wrote: > I've been pushing and pulling various branches around github, and > actually *READ* the top-level README file that github helpfully > throws up on the front page of each repository. It seems like a > few changes might be desired for the upcoming 2.6 branch: > > "THE AUTHORS OF THIS LIBRARY ..." > > IMHO LinuxCNC is substantially more than a library, perhaps > SOFTWARE would be better? > > " Mission Statement <snip> > > 2) Reduce complexity by eliminating support for platforms other > than Linux on x86, with either RTAI or RTLinux for realtime. > (DONE) " > > ...I guess now I know why the ubc code is taking so long to make it > into mainline! ;-) > > Actually all of the Mission Statements are flagged as either (DONE) > or (mostly DONE). Seems like it's time for some new goals!
As you point out, the README obviously hasnt been maintained much... I'd accept a patch that modernizes it to what a top-level README probably should be: a paragraph or two about what the software does, how to build it and get started quick, how to find the user and developer communities, and links to the docs. ;-) -- Sebastian Kuzminsky ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CenturyLink Cloud: The Leader in Enterprise Cloud Services. Learn Why More Businesses Are Choosing CenturyLink Cloud For Critical Workloads, Development Environments & Everything In Between. Get a Quote or Start a Free Trial Today. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=119420431&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
