On Feb 6 2014 6:25 AM, Robert Ellenberg wrote: > On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 8:13 AM, EBo <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Feb 6 2014 5:53 AM, andy pugh wrote: >> > On 6 February 2014 09:27, Robert Ellenberg <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> >> Is there a standard way to treat blends between rapid moves and >> >> regular >> >> feed moves? >> > >> > I don't know if there is a standard way, but I think I would >> normally >> > expect there to be no blending between G0 and G1. ie, exact-stop >> mode >> > to be active. >> >> You are likely correct here. > > > Agreed, an exact stop seems like a safe choice. I'm assuming we'd > still > want blends between rapid moves?
as long as it does not violate some margin of error. > > (If the G0 to G1 transition is in contact with the workpiece >> > something >> > is wrong anyway). >> >> Not quite. Picture a straight plunge cut -- you can go in at speed, >> and then retract at rapid. I see nothing wrong with that, and if >> there >> is a reason that must retract at speed instead of rapid I would like >> to >> hear the rationale. >> > > That would be a G1 to G0 transition, though. A G0 to G1 transition in > contact would mean that the tool hits the work at rapid speed, which > is > probably not safe. as mentioned before. I misunderstood, and I agree. EBo -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Managing the Performance of Cloud-Based Applications Take advantage of what the Cloud has to offer - Avoid Common Pitfalls. Read the Whitepaper. http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=121051231&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
