On 25 July 2015 at 12:35, andy pugh <bodge...@gmail.com> wrote: > As reported in > http://psha.org.ru/irc/%23emc/2015-07-22.html#16:59:29 > > The G-code re-map in the carousel_demo branch gives the error: > 9:duplicate O-word label - already defined in line 29: 'O200 IF > [#<selected_tool> GT 0]'
I have done some experimenting and I am coming to the conclusion that the test in line 861 is not a good test for duplicate O-words. http://git.linuxcnc.org/gitweb?p=linuxcnc.git;a=blob;f=src/emc/rs274ngc/interp_o_word.cc;h=084631e898b3ce00a9e5df5316b636fbe8bed1a8;hb=8b989a180e9e782d02a969da4c32def6c56d2004#l859 I have not yet figured out what it is about the O100 if that triggers a problem in the next IF. (The error actually occurs during interpretation of the second IF) I have tried inserting other IF/ENDIF pairs in the code, but need to actually make some notes of the combinations to figure out the pattern -- atp If you can't fix it, you don't own it. http://www.ifixit.com/Manifesto ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
