On 09/25/2016 04:46 PM, Robert Ellenberg wrote:
> Hi Kirk,
>
> Thanks for giving it a run! It is hard to tell if it's an improvement, but
> it does look like it's tracking smoothly, It would likely help to compare
> the same run without the patch to see if the velocity jitters more.

Oops, I'm sorry, what I posted was a run of the stock LinuxCNC on my 
lathe as a baseline. I haven't installed your fork yet. At this point I 
think I have two tasks, update to Jon's timestamp feature and also try 
your fork. If you can give me a hint for what to look for that may help, 
or I'll look at the issue entries and go from there.

I seem to recall, quite a few years back my threading on this lathe was 
very unstable at the start of the thread. I think synchronized threading 
was fairly new, and someone on the list said to try the new (now old) 
version. Since then threading has worked very well. Jon's timestamp 
feature has been around for a while, but I haven't used my lathe much 
until recently.


-- 
Kirk Wallace
http://www.wallacecompany.com/machine_shop/
http://www.wallacecompany.com/E45/

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to