Ok, but still it would be good that the machine could make the "possible"
part, skipping without damage the part and the tool.
On a later tool, the final toolpath could be reached if the tool
allows, and the user could in fact use the same programmed tool path.
This is my opinion.
Citando andy pugh <[email protected]>:
> On 4 December 2016 at 11:35, Filipe Tomaz
> <[email protected]> wrote: > With this information
>> is possible to "know" the points on the toolpath where the tool can
>> ACTUALLY REACH without damaging both the tool and the work part. This
>> would provide a large improvement even over standard industrial
>> controllers.
> We already have a warning about this.
>
> --
> atp
> "A motorcycle is a bicycle with a pandemonium attachment and is
> designed for the especial use of mechanical geniuses, daredevils and
> lunatics."— George Fitch, Atlanta Constitution Newspaper, 1916
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, SlashDot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
