On Sunday 03 December 2017 11:04:22 andy pugh wrote:

> On 3 December 2017 at 16:00, Gene Heskett <ghesk...@shentel.net> wrote:
> > I find my self having to pick up and move a net statement in order
> > to satisfy the requirement that the src statement must be the first
> > encountered as the file is being parsed,
>
> There is no such requirement. You can connect the  input and output
> pins to a net in absolutely any order you like.

You are saying that

net netname output.pinname another-output.pinname input.pinname is legal 
now? IOW hal now knows what is a source and what is a load 
automatically, and will use the first output.pinname it finds in a long 
line of names as the source pin for that netname?

Okkaaayyyy. But wasn't that a requirement previous to "two-pass"?

Knowing that now, it will ease my mind considerably because it means I 
can use a "netname new-target" high in a file that is not developed as a 
source signal until much later in the file.

Thanks Andy.

Cheers, Gene Heskett
-- 
"There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty:
 soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order."
-Ed Howdershelt (Author)
Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to