Great work Chris, Confirmed as working here now on V 2.9 on my machine Its interesting to watch motion.current_vel and your new motion.requested-vel pins in halshow while running a job. This will be very handy for plasma cutting.
And yes, state tags beckons if you feel the urge now you got this far. Rod Webster *1300 896 832* +61 435 765 611 VMN® www.vmn.com.au On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 at 22:20, Amit Goradia <amitgora...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, 23 Mar, 2020, 1:25 pm Chris Morley, <chrisinnana...@hotmail.com> > wrote: > > > I have been delving deeper into linuxcnc to see if I could correct the > > status of F code. > > For those who don't know the Fcode status report in AXIS (or any gui) is > > actually the status of the interpreter rather then the current Fcode. If > > you have a long program that changes the fcode lat in the program you > will > > see that f code before you should. > > > > I have code that works; it reports through status the current F code, and > > it outputs a HAL pin of current F code. > > I'm not sure I've done it right of course. > > > > It does this by sending a new NML message to motion each time the F code > > changes. > > When that message gets to Motion, it updates status and the HAL pin. > > Since it's read from the interpreted list, it is in sync with the actual > F > > code. > > > > Currently the message is called feedrate or base_feedrate which needs to > > be changed probably to F_code. > > Then I was thinking S code should probably be updated in sync too. > > Rather then having a message per code I could call the message sync_code > > and add other codes to it. > > > > Opinions ? is this the wrong way to go? > > Does my code look wrong? (most of it is boiler code actually) > > > > You can see the commits here (top 6): > > https://github.com/LinuxCNC/linuxcnc/commits/feedcode_message > > > > Chris > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Emc-developers mailing list > > Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers > > > > Hi Chris > > Have you looked at the statetags branch? > It was trying to accomplish something similar in a generic manner. > -automata > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Emc-developers mailing list > Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers > _______________________________________________ Emc-developers mailing list Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
