> Gesendet: Sonntag, 13. November 2022 um 02:11 Uhr
> Von: "Rod Webster" <r...@vehiclemods.net.au>
> An: "EMC developers" <emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net>
> Betreff: Re: [Emc-developers] 2.9 Release Manager Required.
>
> Steffan thanks for clarifying.
> It's been a while since I've used stable (Bullseye) but I don't think there
> would be anything that prevents the current unstable (bookworm)
> packages from  building on Bullseye.
> Maybe they could be uploaded to stable and see what happens?
> That would fill the gap on the stable build that currently exists.
> I don't think you could upload v 2.8 to oldstable because the copyright
> would not be compliant.

I'll give it a try. How this works is that I take the version that arrived in 
bookworm and upload that to stable-backports. More on 
https://backports.debian.org .

> I am willing to lean on my hosting provider to see if he will agree to
> donate a server instance to act as a buildbot with a Debian focus  building
> just the approved debian packages (eg. 2.9 and master). This would give a
> best practice enterprise class redundant hardware platform as a foundation.
> I'll let you know how I go during the week.

I would like to hear from @Seb about this. The machine itself I do not think to 
be the problem.

Best,
Steffen


> On Sun, 13 Nov 2022 at 09:36, Steffen Möller <steffen_moel...@gmx.de> wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > > Gesendet: Samstag, 12. November 2022 um 23:37 Uhr
> > > Von: "Rod Webster" <r...@vehiclemods.net.au>
> > > An: "EMC developers" <emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net>
> > > Betreff: Re: [Emc-developers] 2.9 Release Manager Required.
> > >
> > > John, I wonder if any buildbot could be based on the debian
> > > buildd infrastructure?
> >
> > The Debian Build Demons can be inspected on
> > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=linuxcnc but only work
> > with the packages for unstable. So, we can use them but would not get the
> > insights for the older distributions that I learned LinuxCNC to be used a
> > lot with.
> >
> > > Maybe Steffen could help point the way?
> > > https://www.debian.org/devel/buildd/
> >
> > What is it you want to know?
> >
> > > It kind of makes sense if the future is debian.
> >
> > The future for the automated builds? That could be a plan. Problems with
> > that is that to test if a package works on a distribution you need to
> > upload to that distribution. And if there then was a problem, you will only
> > find that after package was uploaded. For unstable that is not too bad, but
> > for backports to stable, the current buildbot situation may be preferable
> > prior to an upload. We have the Github autobuilds that help.
> >
> > We could upload backports of LinuxCNC to Debian stable and see how this
> > works.
> >
> > Best,
> > Steffen
> >
> >
> > > On Sun, 13 Nov 2022 at 02:14, John Thornton <j...@gnipsel.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Andy,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for everything you have done.
> > > >
> > > > I'm like you and don't have the keys or know the process either...
> > > >
> > > > Now that I have unlimited Internet access I could setup a buildbot but
> > > > like you I lack the expertise or know of a tutorial. It might be
> > > > something for me to attempt in between adding features and fixing bugs
> > > > with mesact.
> > > >
> > > > JT
> > > >
> > > > On 11/11/2022 7:05 PM, andy pugh wrote:
> > > > > I can't do it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Previously the buildbot was integral to the process, but the buildbot
> > > > only
> > > > > builds for Buster- and I have no control over it.
> > > > >
> > > > > LinuxCNC is being built into Debian Bookworm, but I have no
> > involvement
> > > > in
> > > > > this process, and no access rights.
> > > > >
> > > > > Debian Bullseye would be the logical release platform for 2.9. I
> > could
> > > > set
> > > > > up my own build-farm (I have enough hardware) but that would be a
> > lot of
> > > > > work in an area in which I have no expertise.
> > > > >
> > > > > I have asked what the release platform should be, and there wasn't a
> > > > single
> > > > > reply.
> > > > >
> > > > > I will continue as a user and I will continue to offer my support on
> > > > > the forum and mailing lists, I am not going anywhere, but I am both
> > > > > ignorant of what the release policy should be and  incapable of
> > > > performing
> > > > > the release manager role with the accesses and expertise that I have.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Emc-developers mailing list
> > > > Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
> > > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Emc-developers mailing list
> > > Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
> > >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Emc-developers mailing list
> > Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
> >
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Emc-developers mailing list
> Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers
>


_______________________________________________
Emc-developers mailing list
Emc-developers@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/emc-developers

Reply via email to