Robert, According to BS EN 55022 : 1995 cl. 11.2.1 Antenna-to-EUT distance I quote:
"Measurements of the radiated field shall be made with the antenna located at the horizontal distance from the boudary of the EUT as specified in clause 6. The boundary of the EUT is defined by an imaginary straight-line periphery describing a simple geometric configuration encompassing the EUT. All ITE inter-system cables and connecting ITE shall be included within this boundary (see also figure2). NOTE - If the field strength measurement at 10 m cannot be made because of high ambient noise levels or for other reasons, measurement of Class B EUTs may be made at a closer distance, for example 3m. An inverse proportionality factor of 20 dB per decade sahould be used to normalize the measured data to the specified distance for determining compliance. Care should be taken in measurement of large EUTs at 3 m at frequencies near 30 MHz due to near field effects." Clause 6 says the EUT must meet the limits of tables 3 and 4. Tables 3 and 4 are the Class A and Class B limits at a measuring distance of 10 m. FIgure 2 is labeled "Minimum alternative measurement site" and contains a 3 m dimension between the EUT and the antenna. Scott Douglas Principal Compliance Engineer ECRM Incorporated Telephone: 1-508-851-0207 Facsimilie: 1-508-851-7016 e-mail: sdoug...@ecrm.com _______________________________________________________________________________ From: Robert Macy on Thu, Jun 12, 1997 2:25 AM Subject: Distance of Measurements To: emc-p...@ieee.org For measuring emissions per CISPR 22B what is the proper distance for the placement of the antenna? Is it 3m? or 10m? [I'm running across reputable labs that claim there is nothing wrong with measuring everything at 3m, just like FCC B.] - Robert - robert.m...@engineers.com AJM Electronics --- ~ OLX 2.1 TD ~ You'd be surprised how much it costs to look this cheap. ------------------ RFC822 Header Follows ------------------ Received: by macgtwy.ecrm.com with SMTP;11 Jun 1997 22:59:43 -0400 Received: by highlight.ecrm.com (AA01043); Wed, 11 Jun 97 22:40:11 EDT Received: from ruebert.ieee.org by maildrop.ecrm.com (WAA04268); Wed, 11 Jun 1997 22:36:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: (from daemon@localhost) by ruebert.ieee.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA18995 for emc-pstc-list; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 18:28:00 -0400 (EDT) From: robert.m...@engineers.com (Robert Macy) Subject: Distance of Measurements List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org Date: Wed, 11 Jun 1997 20:11:00 GMT Message-Id: <97061115250516...@engineers.com> Organization: The Engineers' Club To: emc-p...@ieee.org Sender: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org Precedence: bulk Reply-To: robert.m...@engineers.com (Robert Macy) X-Resent-To: Multiple Recipients <emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org> X-Listname: emc-pstc X-List-Description: Product Safety Tech. Committee, EMC Society X-Info: Help requests to emc-pstc-requ...@majordomo.ieee.org X-Info: [Un]Subscribe requests to majord...@majordomo.ieee.org X-Moderator-Address: emc-pstc-appro...@majordomo.ieee.org