Robert,

According to BS EN 55022 : 1995 cl. 11.2.1 Antenna-to-EUT distance I quote:

"Measurements of the radiated field shall be made with the antenna located at 
the horizontal distance from the boudary of the EUT as specified in clause 6. 
The boundary of the EUT is defined by an imaginary straight-line periphery 
describing a simple geometric configuration encompassing the EUT. All ITE 
inter-system cables and connecting ITE shall be included within this boundary 
(see also figure2).

     NOTE - If the field strength measurement at 10 m cannot be made because of 
high ambient noise levels or for other reasons, measurement of Class B EUTs may 
be made at a closer distance, for example 3m. An inverse proportionality factor 
of 20 dB per decade sahould be used to normalize the measured data to the 
specified distance for determining compliance. Care should be taken in 
measurement of large EUTs at 3 m at frequencies near 30 MHz due to near field 
effects."

Clause 6 says the EUT must meet the limits of tables 3 and 4. Tables 3 and 4 
are the Class A and Class B limits at a measuring distance of 10 m. FIgure 2 is 
labeled "Minimum alternative measurement site" and contains a 3 m dimension 
between the EUT and the antenna.

Scott Douglas
Principal Compliance Engineer
ECRM Incorporated
Telephone:  1-508-851-0207
Facsimilie: 1-508-851-7016
e-mail:      sdoug...@ecrm.com
_______________________________________________________________________________
From: Robert Macy on Thu, Jun 12, 1997 2:25 AM
Subject: Distance of Measurements
To: emc-p...@ieee.org

For measuring emissions per CISPR 22B  what is the proper distance for
the placement of the antenna?

Is it 3m?  or 10m?

  [I'm running across reputable labs that claim there is nothing wrong
  with measuring everything at 3m, just like FCC B.]

                                         - Robert -
                                  robert.m...@engineers.com
                                       AJM Electronics

---
 ~ OLX 2.1 TD ~ You'd be surprised how much it costs to look this cheap.

------------------ RFC822 Header Follows ------------------
Received: by macgtwy.ecrm.com with SMTP;11 Jun 1997 22:59:43 -0400
Received: by highlight.ecrm.com (AA01043); Wed, 11 Jun 97 22:40:11 EDT
Received: from ruebert.ieee.org by maildrop.ecrm.com (WAA04268); Wed, 11 Jun 
1997 22:36:50 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from daemon@localhost) by ruebert.ieee.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id SAA18995 
for emc-pstc-list; Wed, 11 Jun 1997 18:28:00 -0400 (EDT)
From: robert.m...@engineers.com (Robert Macy)
Subject: Distance of Measurements
List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org
Date: Wed, 11 Jun 1997 20:11:00 GMT
Message-Id: <97061115250516...@engineers.com>
Organization: The Engineers' Club
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Sender: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: robert.m...@engineers.com (Robert Macy)
X-Resent-To: Multiple Recipients <emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org>
X-Listname: emc-pstc
X-List-Description: Product Safety Tech. Committee, EMC Society
X-Info: Help requests to  emc-pstc-requ...@majordomo.ieee.org
X-Info: [Un]Subscribe requests to  majord...@majordomo.ieee.org
X-Moderator-Address: emc-pstc-appro...@majordomo.ieee.org

Reply via email to