------------------------ From: Anthony Guinto <agui...@mc.com> Subject: Re: MIL-STD-461 C vs D Date: Thu, 10 Dec 1998 13:51:23 -0800 To: "Brumbaugh, David" <david.brumba...@pss.boeing.com>, 'emc-pstc' <emc-p...@ieee.org>
> Hello > > Here is the basics on 461D > > MIL-STD-461 D > EMI > CE101 replaces CE01 > CE102 up to 10MHz No Narrow or Wide band only Peak Band. Ummm, just a slight correction here, Tony. The requirement for classification of all emissions into either Narrowband or Broadband categories was dropped. Instead, they specified the measurement (resolution) bandwidths, scan speeds and the detector function (Peak) and dwell times for all emission frequencies. Regards, Ed -------------------------- Ed Price ed.pr...@cubic.com Electromagnetic Compatibility Lab Cubic Defense Systems San Diego, CA. USA 619-505-2780 List-Post: emc-pstc@listserv.ieee.org Date: 12/11/1998 Time: 12:45:42 -------------------------- --------- This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, j...@gwmail.monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
