Koh, You can continue to import product with the N555 code on it if your importer (N123) has a written agreement with importer N555 to do so. Your importer will need to maintain this letter in his files for ACA audits.
I know that this has come up recently and that the ACA has accepted this procedure, in fact they have required it. Check with them. Dick Shultz On 3/2/99 8:36 AM WOODS, RICHARD <wo...@sensormatic.com> said >OEM devices may be imported by more than one company. Each importer is >responsible for filing their own application, having their own approval, >applying the c-tick mark, and issuing a DoC. One importer cannot use the >markings of another importer. Either the OEM or the importer may apply the >label. Each importer can use the test data from the OEM. If the model number >on the product differs from the one on the test report, the OEM should issue >a declaration of identity stating that the two products are identical. > ---------- > From: kohscp [SMTP:koh...@cyberway.com.sg] > Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 1999 12:08 AM > To: emc-p...@ieee.org > Subject: C-Tick importer variation > > Hi, > I have a doubts here regarding the Australia EMC framework. > > Electronic products importing into AS/NZ requires to comply to EMI > (emission) requirement and the respsonble party need to declare the >DoC. > He would need to hold the DoC with supporting documents. Test >reports from > recognise test house would be preferred. > > Let narrow down to the following assumption. > The electronic product does not have connection to telephone network >and no > AC power input. > The responsible party be an importer. And all products from my >company is > imported thru them. > The test house is either NATA accredited or having MRA with NATA > accreditation. > The C-Tick mark is having supplier code used on the label. > > Now the situation is that our importer has registered with ACA(say >having > N123). We are purchasing/OEM products from supplier A. The supplier >A is > having their Australian importer (say N555) on the product label. >What are > my options for importing the product into AS/NZ in respect to which > supplier code to use. > > Questions: > 1) Are we allow to use N555? If yes, what documents, proof or/and >letters > do we need from the supplier? > 2) Do our importer needs to declare the DoC? > 3) If we are requesting the supplier to change the brandname on the >product > label, is N555 still applicable? How about change of model # too? > > 4) If we are to remove N555 on the product and use N123, is >re-testing > required? > 5) If there's product non-conformance found in the market, who will >be the > responsible one? Who would be audited, and for worst case, who would >be fine? > > Your feedback/advice is much appreciated. > > Regards > Koh > > > --------- > This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. > To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org > with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the > quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, > j...@gwmail.monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or > roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators). > >--------- >This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. >To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org >with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the >quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, >j...@gwmail.monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or >roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators). --------- This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, j...@gwmail.monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
