My copy of BS EN 60950, issue 4, January 1998 is entitled " Safety of 
information technology equipment, including electrical business 
equipment".
>From your description, Nick, I'm not convinced that your 
alarm bell box  falls within the scope of 60950 either. 
Unfortunately, none of the other spec lists that I have looked at on 
various web sites seem to cover your application.
Perhaps EN50130-5 (alarm systems - environmental test methods) may 
have some pointers.
Regards,
Geoff Lister

> From:          "Colgan, Chris" <chris.col...@tagmclarenaudio.com>
> To:            "'Nick Williams'" <n...@conformance.co.uk>, 
> emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
> Subject:       RE: Alarm bell box
> Date:          Thu, 29 Apr 1999 09:20:29 +0100
> Reply-to:      "Colgan, Chris" <chris.col...@tagmclarenaudio.com>

> EN60065:1994 is due to be withdrawn on 1/5/00 and replaced by EN60065:1998
> which is published this year.  The 1998 version is entitled "Audio, video
> and similar electronic apparatus - Safety requirements".  I think this
> indicates that it is almost certain that your product should be tested to
> the relevant parts EN60950.
> 
> Chris Colgan
> EMC & Safety
> TAG McLaren Audio Ltd
> 
> mailto:chris.col...@tagmclarenaudio.com
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:       Nick Williams [SMTP:n...@conformance.co.uk]
> > Sent:       28 April 1999 13:39
> > To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
> > Subject:    Alarm bell box
> > 
> > I've been asked to give an opinion on an intruder alarm bell box. EN
> > guidance (CENELEC report R079-001:1998) indicates that either EN60950 or
> > EN60065 may be appropriate for safety, and sooner or later I'll have to
> > make my own mind up as to which to choose. However, if there's anyone out
> > there would not mind telling me which standard they applied in similar
> > circumstances, I'd be grateful to hear from them.
> > 
> > The unit is a box intended for exterior wall mounting and it contains a
> > piezo sounder, xenon tube and associated circuitry including an
> > anti-tamper
> > switch. Incoming supply is actually 12VDC so we won't officially claim
> > compliance with the Low Voltage Directive, but it would still be a good
> > idea to take a standards-based approach to the design.
> > 
> > Nick.
> > 
> > ---------
> > This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
> > To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
> > with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
> > quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
> > jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
> > roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
> =====================================================
> Authorised on 04/29/99 at 09:20:48; code 37160057E34C6B0A.
> 
> ---------
> This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
> with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
> quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
> jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
> roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
> 
*Geoff Lister   email: geoff.lis...@motionmedia.co.uk
*Motion Media Technology Ltd., Horton Hall, Horton, Bristol, BS37 6QN, UK.
*POTS : +44-(0)1454-313444 or +44-(0)1454-338561 (direct)
*ISDN : +44-(0)1454-338555 or +44-(0)1454-338554 (direct)
*FAX  : +44-(0)1454-313678 Home : +44-(0)1275-854025
*WWW  :  http://www.motionmedia.co.uk/

---------
This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list.
To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org
with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the
quotes).  For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com,
jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or
roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).

Reply via email to