Given that sulphuric hard III anodizing is only .001 to .003" thick then I'd have thought not. It is also fairly easy to compromise, so in a mechanical assembly you would be hard pressed to know how good the insulator was or how long it would remain so after the rigours of use (vibration etc.). Better to stick with SIL pad type materials or non-hydroscopic "Fish card" type insulators.
Chris James -----Original Message----- From: Paul J Smith [mailto:paul_j_sm...@notes.teradyne.com] Sent: Tuesday, August 31, 1999 6:20 PM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: "hard anodized" process to insulate metal chassis parts Good afternoon, Does anyone know of a process of "Hard Anodized" metal chassis parts that is considered an acceptable insulator against hazardous voltages by any agency. The related spec describing this process is MIL- A-8625F. Please advise at your earliest convenience. Thanks Best Regards, Paul J Smith Teradyne, Inc., Boston paul.j.sm...@teradyne.com Voice 617-422-2997 FAX 603-843-7526 --------- This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators). --------- This message is coming from the emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to majord...@ieee.org with the single line: "unsubscribe emc-pstc" (without the quotes). For help, send mail to ed.pr...@cubic.com, jim_bac...@monarch.com, ri...@sdd.hp.com, or roger.volgst...@compaq.com (the list administrators).
