Hi Tania, Dan, and Group, Your quote brought up a nagging little question I had last time I was reading through part 15 in this section (I was looking for requirements relating to test equipment manufacturers...there are none) regarding the reference to section 15.5. Where is it or where did it go? My version of the CFR doesn't contain a 15.5, as it stops at section 15.407 in section E. Does anyone know if this is a typo or to what it refers? Thanks, Dave Spencer Oresis Communications
-----Original Message----- From: Grant, Tania (Tania) [mailto:tgr...@lucent.com] Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 1:56 PM To: 'Dan Kinney (A)'; emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: RE: FCC Part 15 exempted devices Importance: High Dan, (For lack of a comma, they hung a guy.) I actually checked to be sure that there is no comma in paragraph (b), since you could have inadvertently omitted it. There is no comma. Therefore...... ... your paragraphs b) and c) apply; however, I don't agree with your use of "only" at the end of your paragraph b). Thus, digital electronic control devices and power systems used exclusively by a public utility, or the same devices and power systems used exclusively in an industrial plant are exempt from Rules Part 15, except for the general conditions of operation in 15.5 and 15.29. (Thou shalt not emit; and if thou emits, thou will provide units for FCC inspection, and thou will cease operation.) Thus, thou is exempt up to a point. Tania Grant, tgr...@lucent.com Lucent Technologies, Switching Solutions Group Intelligent Network and Messaging Solutions -----Original Message----- From: Dan Kinney (A) [ mailto:dan.kin...@heapg.com <mailto:dan.kin...@heapg.com> ] Sent: Wednesday, November 01, 2000 12:41 PM To: emc-p...@ieee.org Subject: FCC Part 15 exempted devices I need help with interpretation of one paragraph in FCC Part 15. I have the 1 Oct 97 version. Paragraph 15.103 (b) says a digital device is exempted from Part 15 if it is "used exclusively as an electronic control or power system utilized by a public utility or in an industrial plant." One could interpret this several ways to include: A digital device is exempted if it is used exclusively as: 1) an electronic control 2) an electronic control utilized by a public utility only 3) an electronic control utilized in an industrial plant The first interpretation is pretty broad and would exclude a lot of equipment. The third interpretation is broad but causes the manufacturer of control equipment to somehow make certain his products do not end up in use anywhere except in an industrial plant. The second interpretation is narrow and might be the real intent of this exemption. I would appreciate any advice on how any of you would interpret this. Thanks in advance. Dan Kinney Horner APG ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Jim Bacher: jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com Michael Garretson: pstc_ad...@garretson.org For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Jim Bacher: jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com Michael Garretson: pstc_ad...@garretson.org For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Jim Bacher: jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com Michael Garretson: pstc_ad...@garretson.org For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org