Sometimes I have seen another reason for the problem of reset caused by surge 
transients.

Inside the power supply is a feed-back signal for control of the output 
voltages and this signal has to pass a galvanic barrier. An optocoupler with a 
bad common mode rejection may have been used and therefore the common mode 
surge transients affects the feed-back signal. In this way the power supply 
shuts down for a short time.





Yours sincerely
Viggo Brøndegaard, Project manager
DELTA
EMC department
Venlighedsvej 4, DK-2970 Hørsholm
Direct tel. +45 4576 7622 ext. 425 
Tel. +45 4586 7722, fax +45 4586 5898
Email: v...@delta.dk
www.delta.dk 


>>> <e...@itsqs.com> 14-06-00 00:09 >>>

Hi Rich:

What I have been hearing from customers is that when they measure the
secondary voltage (3.3VDC,5.0VDC)on the power supply with a scope after the
surge, the voltage drops momentarily thus re-setting the processor. The
power supply when tested as a stand alone unit passes EN 61000-4-5 because
it continues to run.

Usually the client puts the onus on the power supply manufacturer.
Best Regards

Edward F. O'Toole
Intertek Testing Services
 
-----Original Message-----
From: Rich Nute [mailto:ri...@sdd.hp.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2000 4:52 PM
To: rbus...@es.com 
Cc: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org 
Subject: Re: Line/Neutral to Earth MOVS






Hi Rick:


>   Somewhat related to this discussion is the opportunity I had last week
to
>   perform surge testing on an off-the-shelf, rack mounted PC. The power
supply
>   in question was from a reputable manufacturer and had safety, EMC and CE
>   markings. The system (power supply) passed the "Heavy Industrial" limits
>   when tested line to neutral but the computer would reset when tested L/N
to
>   ground. My rationale for this anomaly was the lack of a suppression
device
>   (MOV?) to ground.

I can take some guesses as to what is happening:

1)  The surge current path within the PC developed an 
    EMI radiated signal within the PC that initiated a 
    reset.

2)  The PC was interconnected with other units; the
    surge current path divided between the PC's ground
    wire and the interconnected units' ground wires.
    A voltage developed across the signal ground wires
    (because they are smaller diameter and higher 
    resistance the protective ground wires) which 
    appeared to be a corrupt data signal.  The PC reset.

    (However, I would have expected corrupt data, not a
    consistent reset, from this hypthesis.)

3)  Same as 2, but an EMI radiated signal from the
    grounding path caused the reset.

Whether or not the PC has a discrete suppression device,
the surge current MUST return to its source (i.e., 
complete the circuit).  The suppression device limits 
the voltage excursion, and probably actually increases
the current.  So, I'm not at all sure that a suppression
device would prevent the reset

In the absence of a suppression device, the current is 
due to the Y capacitors and stray capacitance in the unit.  
Initially, the surge current will be high, but then, 
through the capacitance, it can decay faster than with a 
discrete suppression device.  But, the Y-capacitors will 
cause a double differentiation and there will be a 
negative voltage swing before the surge event is complete.

A "suppression device" CAN be used to control the current
path through the PC such that the surge current does not
cause a reset.  

By the way, Y capacitors can also set the surge current
path.


Best regards,
Rich






-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     majord...@ieee.org 
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Jim Bacher:              jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com 
     Michael Garretson:        pstc_ad...@garretson.org 

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org 


-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     majord...@ieee.org 
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Jim Bacher:              jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com 
     Michael Garretson:        pstc_ad...@garretson.org 

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org 



-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Jim Bacher:              jim_bac...@mail.monarch.com
     Michael Garretson:        pstc_ad...@garretson.org

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org

Reply via email to