>-----Original Message-----
>From: Doug McKean [mailto:dmck...@corp.auspex.com]
>Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 11:58 AM
>To: EMC-PSTC Discussion Group
>Subject: Test Equipment ...
>
>
>
>Why or what is the reasoning behind test equipment
>being exempt from all sorts of testing that's required
>for other pieces of equipment?
>
>- Doug McKean
Doug:
The rationale that I recall is that test equipment is expected to be used by
people who understand the nature of electrical measurements and safety.
These people will have the knowledge and resources, beyond those of a
typical consumer, to recognize and ameliorate interference and other
problems. Further, it is argued that compliance measures might hinder
absolute accuracy and sensitivity of measurement equipment. Also, that test
equipment is not usually manufactured in numbers comparable to typical
consumer equipment, so the impact on a society is less.
IIRC, there is a somewhat shorter and simpler explanation buried somewhere
in Part 15.
Ed
Ed Price
ed.pr...@cubic.com
Electromagnetic Compatibility Lab
Cubic Defense Systems
San Diego, CA USA
858-505-2780 (Voice)
858-505-1583 (Fax)
Military & Avionics EMC Services Is Our Specialty
Shake-Bake-Shock - Metrology - Reliability Analysis
-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
unsubscribe emc-pstc
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Michael Garretson: pstc_ad...@garretson.org
Dave Heald davehe...@mediaone.net
For policy questions, send mail to:
Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org
Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.rcic.com/ click on "Virtual Conference Hall,"
