<of5ca6443a.ededb1a9-on86256a76.004dd...@mmm.com>, rehel...@mmm.com inimitably wrote: >What are the chances of "ready made connecting devices" remaining in the >EMCD 2000 as defined (i.e., cables et al)?
Probably. There is a commercial aspect: suppliers of 'good' cables, with high-quality shielding and ferrite rings, don't want to be undercut by damp string imported by Sum Yung Gai. > >If testing (CE marking) is required, are there existing standards/test >methods that will cover these "devices"? I believe they are to be tested for emissions and immunity as part of a 'typical' (compliant) system. > >Or will the TCF route be required? Not likely to be *required*: it is very unpopular, except with Notified Bodies, of course. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. Phone +44 (0)1268 747839 Fax +44 (0)1268 777124. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Why not call a vertically- applied manulo-pedally-operated quasi-planar chernozem-penetrating and excavating implement a SPADE? ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Michael Garretson: pstc_ad...@garretson.org Dave Heald davehe...@mediaone.net For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.rcic.com/ click on "Virtual Conference Hall,"
