I read in !emc-pstc that Ken Javor <ken.ja...@emccompliance.com> wrote (in <20011206195802.LCFL6698.femail7.sdc1.sfba.home.com@[65.11.150.27]>) about 'Stepping receiver, step sizes.', on Thu, 6 Dec 2001: >Keeping the step size to one-half the measurement bandwidth is an accepted >way of assuring that all possible signals are captured. Using a step size >equal to a measurement bandwidth is not quite as good but reasonable.
In the context of 8, 20 or 80 kHz steps to cover 4 GHz, I think reasonableness wins. One would be extraordinarily unlucky to lose a significant signal under those conditions. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk After swimming across the Hellespont, I felt like a Hero. ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Michael Garretson: pstc_ad...@garretson.org Dave Heald davehe...@mediaone.net For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old messages are imported into the new server.
