Dear All,

Many thanks for your comments - I think it may be worth making some comments
in summary:

1-      Lightning has the same effect. Disagree - lightening is an external
effect - Physics 101 and the "Ice Pail" experiment.   If anyone doubts the
difference go and visit the Munich Science Museum where every day (I think
they still do it) a volunteer climbs into a metal 'pod' and is winched
between two electrodes (about 20 feet apart) and becomes part of the
discharge path. Seeing it sure beat reading about it at school.  Any
discharge on the inside of the "Ice Pail" is transferred 'instantaneously to
the outside surface - this is, after all, the principle upon which the Van
de Graff(sp?P generator is based. (Note the volunteer does NOT wave out of
the window!!!)

2-      Holes in structure versus hole and carriers in semiconductor substrates
(yes it was a pun). I agree with those who preferred the idea of perforated
eardrums (depressurization) to perforated electronics.

3-      Dead Pilot versus Dead Electronics. Neither is ideal - but many (most)
commercial aircraft are fly be wire - One of my clients make Simulators -
and I flew (for the first time ever) and Air Bus (simulator) from London
Heathrow to London Gatwick - Landed (ON THE RUNWAY) and taxied (the most
difficult part) to the airport.  I had full control of the simulator and was
flying by instruments. The controls are ALL electronic and if there had been
multiple (i.e. non-random) fails then even a pilot would not have been able
to move the control surfaces.

4-      Testing - at 50kV????? any comments from ESD engineers out there?????

5-      TASER versus Stun gun - thanks for correcting my misunderstanding - Two
comments -  First - if the stun gun is discharged through the airframe there
will be an induced potential in local electronic systems. Second - if I must
turn off my tape recorder (powered but a single AA cell) because it may
affect systems then how is discharging 50k considered to be  safe and OK???

6-      Design of interfaces to cope - some of the prototype systems that I did
safety and reliability work on in (1995)uses surface mount components to
provide lightening protection - these devices would not provide Creepage
distances of more than a couple of millimeters.

7-      Ground computers - I agree that this is worrying - the UK has even more
out of date equipment and then the new system (that will control air traffic
in the South of England) used equipment (and software) purchased in the late
80's early 90's. I just hope that it still works when they take it out of
the box. The point is that RANDOM failures exist and there procedures have
been developed (and practiced) to deal with them.  Anything that induces
non-random and multiple failures is - I suggest - another ball game.

8-      The chances are low - I agree - I was flying back from the west coast 
the
morning of 9-11 and I did not get a warm fuzzy feeling about probability
when I watched the news footage - but I have made many flights since and it
will not stop me from flying. I am grateful for the fact that Europe and the
middle East are sharing their security experiences with the US. Security is
a cultural thing and the US has a long way to go before it provides the same
level of security from officials AND MORE IMPORTANTLY from passengers.



These are Gregg's four pointers to improve security at ZERO cost:
Security guards most NOT walk around together.
ALL alarms must be investigated by security (a telephone call saying OK - is
negligence).
ALL unattended baggage MUST be treated as a bomb.
ANYONE asking me to "keep and eye" on their baggage will be told to take it
with them or I will report it as a bomb.



Security is the responsibility of everyone that flies - Please help to keep
me safe and I will do my best for everyone else.




Best regards

Gregg


-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Ron Pickard:              emc-p...@hypercom.com
     Dave Heald:               davehe...@attbi.com

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org
     Jim Bacher:             j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/
    Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"

Reply via email to