Hi Richard,

It is a test & measurement product used in a telecom environment.  So we
often test DC conducted emissions on the 48VDC input to a hodge-podge
combination of EN61326-1(which uses EN 55022 limits), 300386-X and
certain customer specific EMC standards.  Some of our customers
reference obscure standards such as 300 132-2 paragraphs 4.9.x; these
tests give the lab fits because we're the only customer that does it. 

I will look further into 300 386 for future products.

I didn't spell all of that out in my previous email and I thank you for
pointing out the error.  Seems that I've been so busy lately that I've
been doing everything in incomplete fashion...very frustrating. 

Chris


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Stone, Richard A (Richard) [SMTP:rsto...@lucent.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 10:58 AM
> To:   Chris Maxwell; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
> Subject:      RE: Conducted Emissions---Sandy's Question and John's
> Question
> 
> Is this a telecommunications product?
> if so, then need DC conducted Emissions
> to new EU std. 300386.
> Done from 20khz to 30mhz.
> If product is ITE, then NO DC cond. is needed.
> Richard,
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Maxwell [mailto:chris.maxw...@nettest.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 5:21 PM
> To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
> Subject: RE: Conducted Emissions---Sandy's Question and John's
> Question
> 
> 
> 
> Hi guys,
> 
> Remember, this is just my opinion.   I work for a manufacturer, not a
> test lab; so this is a side job (a HUGE side job); not my life.
> 
> For John:
> 
> We do test the DC input of our rack-mount 48VDC products for conducted
> emissions.  Many of our customers for these systems demand conducted
> emissions testing.  The reasoning here is that these systems will
> operate from a DC "mains" which may operate many other products in the
> same rack or room.  We use the same limits as for AC mains.  
> 
> However, we do not test the conducted emissions of the DC ports of our
> smaller products which run from wall-warts or bricks.    For these
> products, we test the conducted emissions at the AC interface of the
> wall-wart or brick.
> 
> For Sandy:
> 
> When I test wall-warts for conducted emissions, I either plug them
> into
> the LISN directly or I use a short stub cable (about 6" long) made
> from
> Panel Components parts  if I need to adapt the LISN output to a
> wall-wart with a non-US plug configuration.
> 
> I then try to dress the wall-wart's cable in the configuration shown
> in
> the standard for dressing line cords.
> 
> I'm sure there are other methods; but at least you have one opinion.
> 
> Chris Maxwell | Design Engineer - Optical Division
> email chris.maxw...@nettest.com | dir +1 315 266 5128 | fax +1 315 797
> 8024
> 
> NetTest | 6 Rhoads Drive, Utica, NY 13502 | USA
> web www.nettest.com | tel +1 315 797 4449 | 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:       CE-test - Ing. Gert Gremmen - ce-marking and more...
> > [SMTP:cet...@cetest.nl]
> > Sent:       Wednesday, January 23, 2002 2:10 PM
> > To: John Stonier; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
> > Subject:    RE: Conducted emission testing for EN55022
> > 
> > Hi John,
> >  
> > EN 55022:1994 does not speak about DC power supplies. Other
> > standards do.
> > Normally the appropriate measurements are done on the AC supply side
> > af any applied DC-power supply.
> > The pitfall is that a good RF attenuating in the supply may hide the
> > conducted emissions from your EUT, while another power supply
> > may lead to serious spectrum problems.
> > Your problem, because power supply manufactueres do not
> > specify RF isolation classes.
> > I suggest you to apply the test described using a basic transformer
> > rectifier combination + simple stabilization circuit (if required),
> > thereby minimizing attenuation and maximizing RF feedtrough.  
> > Take care to bridge the rectifier diodes
> > with capacitors, otherwize thay might create interference
> themselves.
> >  
> > Regards,
> >  
> > Gert Gremmen, (Ing)
> > Ce-test, qualified testing
> >  
> > ==================================
> > Web presence  <http://www.cetest.nl/>
> > CE-shop <http://www.cetest.nl/ce_shop.htm>
> > /-/ Compliance testing is our core business /-/
> > ==================================
> > 
> >     -----Original Message-----
> >     From: owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
> > [mailto:owner-emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org]On Behalf Of John Stonier
> >     Sent: Wednesday, January 23, 2002 6:26 PM
> >     To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
> >     Subject: Conducted emission testing for EN55022
> >     
> >     
> >     Hi folks
> >      
> >     My test lab's current interpretation of EN55022 is that DC Mains
> > measurements are not required. Sections 5&6 specify measurements
> done
> > on mains ports, but do not specify whether it applies to AC or DC
> > mains. There is a reference in section nine that specifies conducted
> > disturbance is measured between the phase lead and the reference
> > ground, as well as the neutral lead and the reference ground. Does
> > anyone know whether DC measurements are required for this standard?
> >      
> >     John Stonier
> >  << File: Gert Gremmen.vcf >> 
> 
> -------------------------------------------
> This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
> Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.
> 
> Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
> 
> To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
>      majord...@ieee.org
> with the single line:
>      unsubscribe emc-pstc
> 
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>      Michael Garretson:        pstc_ad...@garretson.org
>      Dave Heald                davehe...@mediaone.net
> 
> For policy questions, send mail to:
>      Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org
>      Jim Bacher:             j.bac...@ieee.org
> 
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
>     No longer online until our new server is brought online and the
> old
> messages are imported into the new server.

-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     majord...@ieee.org
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Michael Garretson:        pstc_ad...@garretson.org
     Dave Heald                davehe...@mediaone.net

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org
     Jim Bacher:             j.bac...@ieee.org

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old 
messages are imported into the new server.

Reply via email to