I concur with you John. A CB Certificate is issued on the basis of testing to IEC standards. When I apply to a test lab for a product to be tested, I ask for additional testing for national differences to IEC60065 as required. What I end up with is a CB Certificate that states "Tested and found in conformity with IEC60065 6th edition". Attached is an appendix stating (perhaps) "This apparatus has also passed testing in accordance with CENELEC EN60065, Listed deviations for Australia, Listed Deviations for Singapore.". The test report is similar ie the bulk of the report lists the tests performed to IEC60065 and the deviations to EN60065 etc are attached as appendixes to the report.
Although EN61010-1:2001 has not been published in the OJ yet, I don't see why you can't ask for testing to that standard's deviations and get that standard listed in your CB Certificate's appendix unless EN61010-1:2001 is radically different to IEC61010-1:1990. Chris Colgan Compliance Engineer TAG McLaren Audio Ltd The Summit, Latham Road Huntingdon, Cambs, PE29 6ZU *Tel: +44 (0)1480 415 627 *Fax: +44 (0)1480 52159 * Mailto:chris.col...@tagmclaren.com * http://www.tagmclaren.com > -----Original Message----- > From: Allen, John [SMTP:john.al...@uk.thalesgroup.com] > Sent: 17 January 2002 08:20 > To: 'Brian O'Connell'; emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org > Subject: RE: date of publication relevance to CB Certs > > > Hi Folks > (and I have read some of the subsequent posts on this subject) > > Surely, notification in the OJ is rather irrelevant to a CB certificate - > which is a cert to the basic IEC, not the EN, and is for worldwide use! > Therefore if the IEC CB has already adopted that underlying latest IEC > 61010-1 standard as being acceptable as a basis for CB certs, then the > enginer should issue the CB certificate to the latter (not the EN > version). > > I do grant you that a CB certificate to a non-OJ notified standard might > cause you some problems within the EU - and the engineer in question > should > probably point that out. > > Or have I got something wrong somewhere? (I don't think so). > > John Allen > Thales Defence Communications > Bracknell, UK > (for about the next 2-3 months until I am redundant!) > > -----Original Message----- > From: Brian O'Connell [mailto:boconn...@t-yuden.com] > Sent: 16 January 2002 16:19 > To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org > Subject: date of publication relevance > > > > Good people of the PSTC > > The safety agency engineer, doing the CB report, says that he cannot use > EN61010-1:2001 because it is not yet "recognized". > > As the DOP = 01 Nov 2001, I do not understand. > > Can someone please educate me???? > > R/S, > Brian O'Connell > Taiyo Yuden (USA), Inc. > > > ------------------------------------------- > This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety > Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. > > Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ > > To cancel your subscription, send mail to: > majord...@ieee.org > with the single line: > unsubscribe emc-pstc > > For help, send mail to the list administrators: > Michael Garretson: pstc_ad...@garretson.org > Dave Heald davehe...@mediaone.net > > For policy questions, send mail to: > Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org > Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org > > All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: > No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old > messages are imported into the new server. > > ------------------------------------------- > This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety > Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. > > Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ > > To cancel your subscription, send mail to: > majord...@ieee.org > with the single line: > unsubscribe emc-pstc > > For help, send mail to the list administrators: > Michael Garretson: pstc_ad...@garretson.org > Dave Heald davehe...@mediaone.net > > For policy questions, send mail to: > Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org > Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org > > All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: > No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old > messages are imported into the new server. ************************************************************** Please visit us at www.tagmclaren.com ************************************************************** The contents of this E-mail are confidential and for the exclusive use of the intended recipient. If you receive this E-mail in error, please delete it from your system immediately and notify us either by E-mail, telephone or fax. You should not copy, forward or otherwise disclose the content of the E-mail. TAG McLaren Audio Ltd The Summit, 11 Latham Road Huntingdon, Cambs, PE29 6ZU Telephone : 01480 415600 (+44 1480 415600) Facsimile : 01480 52159 (+44 1480 52159) ************************************************************** Please visit us at www.tagmclaren.com ************************************************************** ------------------------------------------- This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Michael Garretson: pstc_ad...@garretson.org Dave Heald davehe...@mediaone.net For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: No longer online until our new server is brought online and the old messages are imported into the new server.
