Hello Chun -
 
Could you identify the legal documents from the governments for Korea and
China that have these statements?  I would be interested in understanding a
bit further.  Thanks.
 

Regards, 

Mark F. Gill 
Sr. Engineer 
C-MAC Design Corporation, A Solectron Company 
4222 Emperor Blvd, Suite 300 
RTP, NC  27703 
P: (919)-474-3569 
markg...@solectron.com 

-----Original Message-----
From: Chun Kim [mailto:c...@approvalspecialists.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 7:53 PM
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org
Subject: Re: Taiwan and China approvals?


Hello Patrick and Group,
 
By 'optical networking type products', I'm assuming your equipment
incorporates OC-3 thru OC-192 type interfaces.
 
Korea:
Telecom products, including those that incorporate optical interfaces,
require telecom type approval and certification by the RRL (Radio Research
Laboratory). By definition, telecom type approval requires Telecom, EMC and
Safety testing to be performed by an accredited lab (please note all
accredited labs reside in Korea, with the exception of the ones accredited
by virtue of an MRA - i.e. Canada). Telecom testing on optical interfaces is
fairly limited. EMC is essentially the Korean translation of CISPR 22 and
CISPR 24 standards. Safety is based on IEC 60950. For purposes of the
MIC/RRL certification process, ALL 3 disciplines must be carried out by an
accredited lab. 
 
IT products not falling under the scope of telecom type approval must still
be submitted for EMC testing and approval. Testing is limited to emissions
and immunity (standards above) and the same test lab accreditation rules
apply.
 
There is a separate safety scheme known as K-Mark, where overseas labs may
hold accreditation by virtue of a private (non-government) MoU type
arrangement. These are for the most part unrelated to the MIC/RRL schemes.
And based on your product description, I don't believe your product falls
under the scope of K-Mark certification (unless you include an AC/DC
adaptor, which does require K-Mark).
 
China:
Optical networking equipment typically falls under the scope of MII
(Ministry of Information Industry) administered Network Access License
scheme. This is essentially the Chinese type approval process. Local
in-country testing is required (including extensive protocol and functional
testing) for the NAL procedure. 
 
The former CCIB and CCEE safety schemes were recently rolled into one
combined process known as the Compulsory Safety Certification Scheme, or CCC
Mark. Optical networking products do not typically apply under the CCC. The
scope of IT and Telecom equipment is currently limited to products such as :
PCs, AC/DC adaptors, Servers, Copiers, Scanners, Phones and Phone Systems,
Facsimiles, Modems, DSL Modems, GSM and CDMA handsets and terminals, ISDN
Terminals, etc. However, as with Korea, an AC/DC adaptor will require CCC
approval.
 
We can provide more detailed requirements, costs and process information if
you would like to contact us off-line and forward technical specifications.
 
Best Regards,
Chun Kim
The Approval Specialists
www.approvalspecialists.com <http://www.approvalspecialists.com> 
 

----- Original Message ----- 
From: pfitzgib...@attbi.com <mailto:pfitzgib...@attbi.com>  
To: emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org <mailto:emc-p...@majordomo.ieee.org>  
Sent: Tuesday, August 20, 2002 12:12 AM
Subject: Taiwan and China approvals?


Greetings everybody!

My boss just asked me what the procedure and timeframe 
for getting into Korea and China was.  (Imagine my 
distress ;-).  For optical networking type products (no 
TNV ports) where all of our Safety, NEBS and EU (386, 
019, 753, etc...) tesing is complete, does anyone know 
what to submit (and to whom) and how long this might 
take for China or Korea?  

more background - Luckily our CB report is from a Korea 
certified lab, but our emissions and immunity were from 
non-global (but EU CAB & NRTL status) labs that don't 
have Korean authorization.

I've also done some looking into the new China CCC 
procedure.  We're not specifically addressed in the 
catalogue.  Does this mean we can just import our system?

Any help on any of these points would be greatly 
appreciated!

Thanks in advance,
Patrick Fitzgibbon

-------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety
Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list.

Visit our web site at:  http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/
<http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/> 

To cancel your subscription, send mail to:
     majord...@ieee.org <mailto:majord...@ieee.org> 
with the single line:
     unsubscribe emc-pstc

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
     Ron Pickard:              emc-p...@hypercom.com
<mailto:emc-p...@hypercom.com> 
     Dave Heald:               davehe...@attbi.com
<mailto:davehe...@attbi.com> 

For policy questions, send mail to:
     Richard Nute:           ri...@ieee.org <mailto:ri...@ieee.org> 
     Jim Bacher:             j.bac...@ieee.org <mailto:j.bac...@ieee.org> 

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
    http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/ <http://ieeepstc.mindcruiser.com/> 
    Click on "browse" and then "emc-pstc mailing list"



Reply via email to