I read in !emc-pstc that Peter L. Tarver <peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com> wrote (in <nebbkemlgllmjofmopleeefkekaa.peter.tar...@sanmina-sci.com>) about 'fuse replacement markings' on Wed, 27 Aug 2003: >Since the fuse is operator replaceable, I do not expect that marking as >you represented below, will meet the requirements of the standard, since >the intent is to use more plain language than that.
Aren't you trying to conform to IEC 60950? If so, the code that I posted is what is required. I am surprised that clause 1.7.6 is so vague, when the corresponding clause in IEC 60065 is very explicit that the code specified in IEC 60127 shall be used. -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Interested in professional sound reinforcement and distribution? Then go to http://www.isce.org.uk PLEASE do NOT copy news posts to me by E-MAIL! This message is from the IEEE EMC Society Product Safety Technical Committee emc-pstc discussion list. Visit our web site at: http://www.ewh.ieee.org/soc/emcs/pstc/ To cancel your subscription, send mail to: majord...@ieee.org with the single line: unsubscribe emc-pstc For help, send mail to the list administrators: Ron Pickard: emc-p...@hypercom.com Dave Heald: emc_p...@symbol.com For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: ri...@ieee.org Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org Archive is being moved, we will announce when it is back on-line. All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
