Bob Richards <[email protected]> wrote (in <[email protected]>) about 'EMC Ethics', on Tue, 19 Jul 2005:
>IMHO, the difference should have been a flag for someone to question >measurement techniques. SHUSH! We all know that the Emperor has no clothes, but we don't mention it! (;-) The justification for the very imperfect measurements that we have for EMC phenomena are: - nevertheless, they seem to work; - we don't have any better methods, and in many cases we don't even see a route to developing a better method. Nevertheless, we are very often attempting to measure Jell-O (TM) with a micrometer. (;-) -- Regards, John Woodgate, OOO - Own Opinions Only. Deadlines are 90% of deadliness. http://www.jmwa.demon.co.uk Also see http://www.isce.org.uk This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
