The question, as stated, cannot be answered. Conditions of acceptability published by the cable mfr ?
Requirements of enviroment for the cable installation ? If the agency report and the issued certification/recognition specifies "tri-rated" as construction requirement, then any other construction is non-conforming. luck, Brian From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On Behalf Of Fred Townsend Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 8:35 AM To: Gordon,Ian Cc: 'IEEE EMC & SAFETY PSTC' Subject: Re: Tri rated cable Yes I read the message. Much as I'd like to believe I know it all I don't so I didn't reply. Fred Townsend Gordon,Ian wrote: All Did anyone receive this? I'm surprised I got no replies at all! Ian Gordon From: Gordon,Ian Sent: 24 June 2005 08:41 To: 'IEEE EMC & SAFETY PSTC' Subject: Tri rated cable All Does anyone know the detail of the differences between the three standards that combine allow a cable to be defined as "tri-rated"? We currently spec a "tri-rated" cable in our design but at this time only a UL1015 cable is available to us. Thus I am particularly interested in learning how "far away" a UL1015 specified cable is from a "tri-rated" one. Would the electrical safety (i.e. EN61010 compliance) of our products be compromised by the substitution of a UL1015 cable for a "tri-rated" one? Any help is appreciated. Ian Gordon This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
