All Does anyone know the detail of the differences between the three standards that combine allow a cable to be defined as "tri-rated"? We currently spec a "tri-rated" cable in our design but at this time only a UL1015 cable is available to us. Thus I am particularly interested in learning how "far away" a UL1015 specified cable is from a "tri-rated" one. Would the electrical safety (i.e. EN61010 compliance) of our products be compromised by the substitution of a UL1015 cable for a "tri-rated" one? Any help is appreciated.
Ian Gordon *********************************************************************** The information contained in this email and any attachments may be confidential and is provided solely for the use of the intended recipient(s). If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution, or use of this e-mail, its attachments or any information contained therein is unauthorised and prohibited. If you have received this in error, please contact the sender immediately and delete this e-mail and any attachments. No responsibility is accepted for any virus or defect that might arise from opening this e-mail or attachments, whether or not it has been checked by anti-virus software. This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] For policy questions, send mail to: Richard Nute: [email protected] Jim Bacher: [email protected] All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
