I know this is a late reply, but in addition to the earlier responses that
addressed the question, this was indeed an EU - not just UK - issue.

The UK's PUWER Regulations [Statutory Instrument 1998 No. 2306] is the UK's
national transposition of one of the worker-safety directives, 89-655-EEC and
95/63/EC [Council Directive 89/655/EEC of 30 November 1989 concerning the
minimum safety and health requirements for the use of work equipment by
workers at work (second individual Directive within the meaning of Article 16
(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC) etc.]

See http://www.dti.gov.uk/strd/worker.html

In other words, other EU (and perhaps candidate members?) will have their own
national transpositions, which should necessarily be similar. (Directives are
addressed to the member governments.)

On the product side, some more familiar examples of UK Regulations may be:
- The Supply of Machinery (Safety) Regulations 1992 (SI 1992/3073) as amended
by The Supply of Machinery Safety) (Amendment) Regulations 1994 ( SI 1994/2063)
- The Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) Regulations 2005 (SI 2005/281)
- The Electrical Equipment (Safety) Regulations 1994 (SI 1994 No. 3260)
The first is the UK transposition of the Machinery Directive. Readers will no
doubt guess the other two.

Totally off the original topic, but as an example of how national
transpositions can intentionally differ from the directive, the UK's
Electrical Equipment (Safety) Regulations cover second-hand products as well
as new products, whereas the LVD only required countries to regulate new
products.

See http://www.dti.gov.uk/strd/ecdirect.html

We sometimes get enquiries about some "mysterious" national law, federal law,
regulation, presidential decree, royal decree, etc. applied in an EU country,
which will often turn out to be [as it should be] a reference to the national
implementation of an EU directive. (In Germany, some directives are
implemented by individual federal states.) In case you've read this far(!),
here is a more obscure example:
http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/rail_guided_transport/transpositions.htm 


Best regards, glyn

TUV Rheinland of North America, Inc.
Product Safety & -Quality
Industrial Machinery Division (Chicago Office)

Glyn R. Garside
Senior Engineer
Functional Safety Program Manager
1945 Techny Rd, Unit 4
NORTHBROOK, IL 60062-5357, USA
Tel    (847)562-9888 ext 25
 <http://www.us.tuv.com/> http://www.us.tuv.com

[email protected] wrote on 07/19/2005 10:50:34:
> Hi to all,
> This is a UK - possibly EU - question.
> 
> In the UK we have the Provision and Use of Work Equipment 
> Regulations that requires a person who provides or controls 
> equipment used at work to comply with the regulations.
> 
> The regulations require that equipment provided for use at work must
> comply with legislation implementing any EC directives on CE 
> marking, be constructed or adapted so as to be suitable for the work
> undertaken... etc..  such that the operator is not put at risk.
> 
> So - what is the UK Industry Best Practice (IBP) for the supply and 
> use of equipment that is designed, constructed and used "in house". 
> The type of thing I am meaning is the special power supply, the I/O 
> indicator, the custom test rig, that is built to support the design 
> and development of the product. It might be a 10 minute build, or a 
> ten week build.
> 
> If some things are not worth certifying against applicable 
> directives, how is PUWER complied with?
> 
> What do the other EU / Other nations do in this respect?
> 
> Thanks in advance




- ---------------------------------------------------------------- This
message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to [email protected] 


Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/listserv/request/user-guide.html 


List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 


For help, send mail to the list administrators: 


Scott Douglas [email protected] Mike Cantwell [email protected] 


For policy questions, send mail to: 


Jim Bacher: [email protected] David Heald: [email protected] 


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 


http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc


Reply via email to