A relatively simple resistive network can be designed for measuring
common-mode voltage on Ethernet and many other high-speed interfaces that
utilize differential-pair lines, which - with minor modifications - would be
perfectly suitable for this application. I have used it for about 10 years,
had a paper about it at the Seattle IEEE EMC Symposium (about 8 years ago -
coincidently about as long as the standard has been chewed on). Meanwhile it
has evolved into a more versatile device than what was described then. But I
gues it may be of no interest to people who write standards <grin>
 
Neven
 

-------------- Original message -------------- 
From: John Woodgate <j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk> 

> In message 
> , 
> dated Thu, 13 Apr 2006, jim.hulb...@pb.com writes 
> >We have an ethernet port to which is connected a CAT5 cable. When this 
> >cable is routed through an ISN per EN 55022 for conducted emissions 
> >measurements, the port is unable to function. What experience have 
> >people had with ISNs in this application, or what experience do people 
> >have with the alternate test methods (current probe and/or voltage 
> >probe measurements)? 
> 
> Since it's taken about 8 years to get even a fragile agreement on 
> conducted emissions in CISPR 22/EN 55022, you'd think that everything 
> would be crystal-clear by ! now. > 
> I don't know which edition of EN 55022 you are using by the 1998 
> edition, with corrigenda 1 and 2 and amendments 1 and 2 says in 9.5.3.1: 
> 'Where normal functioning cannot be achieved because of the impact of 
> the ISN on the EUT, the measurement shall be carried out using the 
> method given in 9.5.3.5.' This in turn refers you to Annex C, C.1.3 or 
> C.1.4. 
> 
> C.1.3 uses a current probe and a voltage probe. C.1.4 uses two current 
> probes and a moveable ferrite 'adjuster'. It takes a long time. 
> -- 
> OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk 
> 2006 is YMMVI- Your mileage may vary immensely. 
> 
> John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK 
> 
> - 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------- 
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society 
> emc-pst! c discu ssion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 
> 
> To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org 
> 
> Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 
> 
> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 
> 
> For help, send mail to the list administrators: 
> 
> Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net 
> Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org 
> 
> For policy questions, send mail to: 
> 
> Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org 
> David Heald: emc-p...@daveheald.com 
> 
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 
> 
> http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 

- ---------------------------------------------------------------- This
message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org 


Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 


List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 


For help, send mail to the list administrators: 


Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org 


For policy questions, send mail to: 


Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org David Heald: emc-p...@daveheald.com 


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 


http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 


Reply via email to