In message <jpecimgpcjpkcjgliabaceohdaaa....@bolls.dk>, dated Tue, 25 Jul 2006, Kim Boll Jensen <k...@bolls.dk> writes
>Why can UL/CSA 60950 accept this when CAN/CSA-C22.2 No. 223-M91 can't ? >(or have UL made a mistake when approving the PSU for CSA 60950 ?) With only 5.1 mm gap, it might be possible to touch a blade while the plug is still partly in the wall-socket. Plain 2-blade plugs used to have much smaller gaps, and it was rather easy to touch a blade while it was live. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk 2006 is YMMVI- Your mileage may vary immensely. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org David Heald: emc-p...@daveheald.com All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
