My truck's compass failed.  No doubt the unintended consequences of 
installing that magnetic antenna mount. Murphy! 

I suggest  two other unofficial anti-Murphy flight instruments: 


1.      Seat of pants
2.      Wet finger in the air


  de AE6QL

Pettit, Ghery wrote: 

14 CFR 91.205(b) lists the required equipment on a certificated aircraft

when flying under VFR (Visual Flight Rules).  One could argue that an

altimeter is a piece of navigation equipment, but the only other

required navigation device is a "Magnetic direction indicator".  Sounds

like a compass to me.  Before anyone jumps on the "airspeed indicator"

bandwagon, remember, it reads indicated, not true, and it is speed

through the air, not over the ground.  Zero wind, OK.  Anything else,

who knows?  Keeping your flight log up to date?



For those of you who aren't pilots, I'm sorry.  For those who are, isn't

this fun?



Oh, and Julie Boatman had the compass fail in AOPA's Cutlass while

bringing it from the purchase location to start the restoration for next

year's give-away.  So they aren't completely fail proof.  But they are

more reliable than any gyro.



Fly safe.



Ghery







From: peter_kelle...@dell.com [mailto:peter_kelle...@dell.com] 

Sent: Tuesday, February 13, 2007 2:35 PM

To: Pettit, Ghery; j...@jmwa.demon.co.uk; emc-p...@ieee.org

Subject: RE: IATA Regulations





In fact, it's not just a fall back instrument in the world of general

aviation. There are many aircraft flying today where the lowly compass

is the primary (or even the only) navigational instrument. It has its

idiosyncrasies but once understood, its reliability and predicatability

remain unmatched by more advanced instrumentation.



I recall hearing an instructor once dismissing a gyroscopic heading

indicator as a mere 'luxury'. Still...a sneaky glance at the handheld

GPS never hurts.



Regards



Peter.





From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of Pettit,

Ghery

Sent: 13 February 2007 17:28

To: John Woodgate; emc-p...@ieee.org

Subject: RE: IATA Regulations



No, but that old magnetic compass is still the fall back instrument for

navigation.  In fact, I set the gyro compass (heading indicator) to the

magnetic compass every 15 minutes or so on the planes I fly.  Some more

modern HIs automatically correct using a magnetic sensor, but the idea

is the same.  Don't mess with the magnetic compass, you really want to

be able to depend on it.



Ghery S. Pettit





From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of John

Woodgate

Sent: Monday, February 12, 2007 10:31 AM

To: emc-p...@ieee.org

Subject: Re: IATA Regulations



In message  <mailto:45d087ad.9090...@sun.com> <45d087ad.9090...@sun.com>,
dated Mon, 12 Feb 2007, Monrad

Monsen  <mailto:monrad.mon...@sun.com> <monrad.mon...@sun.com> writes



  

In fact, 49CFR only has the forbidden magnetic levels in the 

regulations (deviate the compass by 2.0 degrees at a distance of 15 

feet).

    



Do modern aircraft still rely on a lodestone, then? (;-)

--

OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk

There are benefits from being irrational - just ask the square root of

2.

John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK



-



This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society

emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/



To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org



Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html



List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html



For help, send mail to the list administrators:



     Scott Douglas           emcp...@ptcnh.net

     Mike Cantwell           mcantw...@ieee.org



For policy questions, send mail to:



     Jim Bacher:             j.bac...@ieee.org

     David Heald:            emc-p...@daveheald.com



All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:



    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc



-

  



______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
______________________________________________________________________

- ---------------------------------------------------------------- This
message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ 

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org 


Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html 


List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html 


For help, send mail to the list administrators: 


Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org 


For policy questions, send mail to: 


Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org David Heald: emc-p...@daveheald.com 


All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: 


http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc 


Reply via email to