In message <000e01c793fe$cb4aed50$d600a...@tamuracorp.com>, dated Fri, 11 May 2007, Brian O'Connell <oconne...@tamuracorp.com> writes:
>But the basis of the problem posed by the OP is the std's use of terms >outside of what is taught in school. The OP wanted to know how to >implement the test, and because this std has, IMO, deviated from >accepted mathematics and physics terms, he was not able to design a >Type Test to indicate conformance to the std. I just don't understand your point. The OP wanted to know where to obtain a filter, and didn't say, as far as I know, that he was bugged by any terminology and couldn't do the test. Maybe you saw an article that I didn't, but .... -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk There are benefits from being irrational - just ask the square root of 2. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org David Heald: emc-p...@daveheald.com All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________
