In message <12d6af78e37dc842b24ef1593c7a035bbe1...@server15.rossvideo.com>, dated Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Donald McElheran <dmcelhe...@rossvideo.com> writes:
>The same requirements are spelled out IEC 60065 7h Edition. The >requirements make no mention of rated voltage tolerances. The standard >quite specifically make reference to the "RATED SUPPLY VOLTAGE of the >apparatus" or the upper limit of the RATED VOLTAGE RANGE". In your case >you indicate 230V where 1.2x230 is the 276V. But ignoring the tolerance may well be unwise. Another one for the committee! -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk There are benefits from being irrational - just ask the square root of 2. John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org David Heald: emc-p...@daveheald.com All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________