Jim,

        The requirement comes from the US NEC article 100 under the
definitions Labeled and Listing and in article 110-2 & 3.  The NEC Handbook
clearly states:  The Code requires that all equipment be approved as defined
in Article 100 and, as such, be acceptable to the authority having
jurisdiction.  OSHA has invoked this aspect of the code for industrial
equipment.  
        In the US the application of the requirement is left to local
electrical inspectors and to the commercial & consumer marketplace (big box
stores won't carry your product without Listing).  [I usually wryly point
out that Americans are good at setting requirements but lax in enforcement -
until there's a problem.]

        Canada has similar requirements in the CEC.  The Canadians are more
aggressive about enforcement; I have worked with several clients who were
forced to seek certification after getting caught without it.  

        Save yourself a bunch of trouble later on and get it up front while
you can still affect the design and get the needed changes in place. 

        I hope that this helps.  

:>)     br,     Pete

        Peter E Perkins, PE
        Principal Product Safety & Regulatory Consultant
        Tigard, ORe  97281-3427

        503/452-1201    fone/fax
        [email protected]

-
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to
<[email protected]>

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://product-compliance.oc.ieee.org/
Graphics (in well-used formats), large files, etc. can be posted to that URL.

Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/
Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas <[email protected]>
Mike Cantwell <[email protected]>

For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher:  <[email protected]>
David Heald: <[email protected]>

Reply via email to