In message <e1e443d9fa97c74d8cd610a12f276e6095d...@asp1exch2.aspect.com>, dated Fri, 2 May 2008, "Richards, Carl" <carl.richa...@aspect.com> writes:
>only the very poorest newcomer (poorest in the sense of piss poor >planning) would embark upon the design of a product and then discover >that it?s product failed to meet the regs during the testing phase. Pardon? This is standard industry practice. It shouldn't be, but it is. The design is 'finished' and THEN the safety and EMC experts get to re-design it for compliance at huge cost and very damaging delay. Only a few enlightened companies build in safety and EMC from Day 1 of the design phase. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk Murphy's Law has now been officially re-named The Certainty Principle John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org David Heald: emc-p...@daveheald.com All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
