Thanks guys, but the question was not "where can I get copies of these
standards?", but a request for a technical comparison of the limits / levels /
methods embodied within them.
Which as you can appreciate, is no small task. So not wishing to possibly
re-invent the wheel, I posed the question as I did.
Best Regards,
Dave Coleman AIIRSM
SELEX Communications
"Barker, Neil" <neil.bar...@e2v.com>
01/07/2008 15:58
To
"'Powell, Doug'" <doug.pow...@aei.com>, david.cole...@selex-comms.com,
emc-p...@ieee.org
cc
Subject
RE: MIL-STD 461 vs. DSTAN 59-41
Also, all DEF STANs are available at http://www.dstan.mod.uk/
<http://www.dstan.mod.uk/>
Neil Barker
Manager
Central Quality
e2v
106 Waterhouse Lane, Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 2QU, England
Tel: +44 (0)1245 453616
Mobile: +44 (0)7801 723735
Fax: +44 (0)1245 453571
www.e2v.com <http://www.e2v.com/>
P Consider the environment: do you really need to print this e mail?
From: Powell, Doug [mailto:doug.pow...@aei.com]
Sent: 30 June 2008 18:44
To: david.cole...@selex-comms.com; emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: RE: MIL-STD 461 vs. DSTAN 59-41
All Mil-Stds are available at http://assist.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/
<http://assist.daps.dla.mil/quicksearch/>
-doug
________________________________
From: emc-p...@ieee.org [mailto:emc-p...@ieee.org] On Behalf Of
david.cole...@selex-comms.com
Sent: Monday, June 30, 2008 2:15 AM
To: emc-p...@ieee.org
Subject: MIL-STD 461 vs. DSTAN 59-41
Has anyone got (or know of) a comparison between DEFSTAN 59-41 and MIL-STD 461
(any versions, but preferably recent), that ideally covers the Land Use
aspects of the standards?
I know the UK MoD will accept 461 tested equipment, but for an RFQ it is
better to respond with some technical argument why a read across is (or isn't)
feasible.
Any help appreciated,
Best Regards,
Dave Coleman AIIRSM
------------------------------------------------------------
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
Sent by E2V TECHNOLOGIES PLC or a member of the E2V group of companies. A
company registered in England and Wales.
Company number; 04439718.
Registered address; 106 Waterhouse Lane, Chelmsford, Essex, CM1 2QU, UK.
This email and any attached files contains company confidential information
which may be legally privileged. It is intended only for the person(s) or
entity to which it is addressed and solely for the purposes set forth therein.
If you are not the intended recipient or have received this email in error
please notify the sender by return, delete it from your system and destroy any
local copies. It is strictly forbidden to use the information in this email
including any attachment or part thereof including copying, disclosing,
distributing, amending or using for any other purpose.
In addition the sender excludes all liabilities (whether tortious or common
law) for damage or bre ach arising or related to this email including but not
limited to viruses and libel.
SELEX Communications Limited is a Private Limited Company registered in
England and Wales under Company Number 964533 and whose Registered Office is
Lambda House, Christopher Martin Rd, Basildon, SS14 3EL. England.
- ---------------------------------------------------------------- This
message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc
discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org
Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
For help, send mail to the list administrators:
Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org
For policy questions, send mail to:
Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org David Heald: emc-p...@daveheald.com
All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
