Hi Ed,

We have pushed our test capability to 3000 v/m right now, but that's 
only from 1 to 18 GHz. The limit is the chamber size, our chamber was 
built to test small boxes ( like shoe box size ). This chamber is mode 
tuned. We plan to make one big enough for DO-160 testing, but so far 
have no results to share.

For the very high fields, I would avoid the galvanized Steel panels, 
they lower the Q.

A big problem we faced was field probes for these levels: I still 
haven't found what I'd call the ideal probe.

We have only tested 1 box that was tested here at 200 v/m and went on 
for the very high fields ( 14 kV/m and higher ), it passed both places, 
so not a great data point I'm afraid.

Sincerely,

Derek Walton
L F Research

Price, Edward wrote:
> *I have had a fair amount of experience in making sure that military 
> systems can meet the MIL-STD-461 RS103 requirement of 200 V/M. 
> However, we are now seeing system requirements for levels from 
> MIL-STD-464 (and other places). These new requirements invoke immunity 
> to levels such as 8 GHz to 10 GHz at 21,000 V/M (peak pulse).*
> ** 
> *I would like to get an idea of the amount of risk involved in going 
> to that next level. Has anyone had any experiences with meeting the 
> 461 200 V/M and then trying for the 464 levels? Does equipment that 
> meets 461 usually meet those 464 levels? If not, what kind of failures 
> do you see (cable arcing, internal component destruction)?*
> ** 
> *Thanks in advance!*
> ** 
> *
> */Ed Price/*
> ed.pr...@cubic.com <mailto:ed.pr...@cubic.com>*     WB6WSN*
> *NARTE Certified EMC Engineer & Technician*
> *Electromagnetic Compatibility Lab*
> *Cubic Defense Applications*
> *San Diego, CA  USA*
> *858-505-2780 (Voice)*
> *858-505-1583 (FAX)*
> */Military & Avionics EMC Is Our Specialty/*
> *
> - ---------------------------------------------------------------- 
> This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society 
> emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/
>
> To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org
>
> Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html
>
> List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html
>
> For help, send mail to the list administrators:
>
> Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org
>
> For policy questions, send mail to:
>
> Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org David Heald: emc-p...@daveheald.com
>
> All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:
>
> http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
>

-

This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society
emc-pstc discussion list.    Website:  http://www.ieee-pses.org/

To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org

Instructions:  http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html

List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html

For help, send mail to the list administrators:

     Scott Douglas           emcp...@ptcnh.net
     Mike Cantwell           mcantw...@ieee.org

For policy questions, send mail to:

     Jim Bacher:             j.bac...@ieee.org
     David Heald:            emc-p...@daveheald.com

All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at:

    http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc




Reply via email to