In message <768ee6ab7d56d54bb5000ec2dd113e71044fc...@de01exm61.ds.mot.com>, dated Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Leber Jody-G19980 <jody.le...@motorola.com> writes:
>In the past, IEC 60950-1 for CB Certification has been accepted by many >test houses for batteries that claim some relation to ITE equipment. >More recently, we have been required to also evaluate the battery to >IEC 62133 before they would even consider issuing a CB Certificate to >IEC 60950-1. Has anyone else experienced this change? I hope not: that's called 'gold-plating' a standard - arbitrarily requiring additional requirements or standards to be applied. It is possible to register a protest with IECEE about this, unless the test house can show evidence that IECEE has endorsed the requirement. -- OOO - Own Opinions Only. Try www.jmwa.demon.co.uk and www.isce.org.uk Either we are causing global warming, in which case we may be able to stop it, or natural variation is causing it, and we probably can't stop it. You choose! John Woodgate, J M Woodgate and Associates, Rayleigh, Essex UK - This message is from the IEEE Product Safety Engineering Society emc-pstc discussion list. Website: http://www.ieee-pses.org/ To post a message to the list, send your e-mail to emc-p...@ieee.org Instructions: http://listserv.ieee.org/request/user-guide.html List rules: http://www.ieee-pses.org/listrules.html For help, send mail to the list administrators: Scott Douglas emcp...@ptcnh.net Mike Cantwell mcantw...@ieee.org For policy questions, send mail to: Jim Bacher: j.bac...@ieee.org David Heald: emc-p...@daveheald.com All emc-pstc postings are archived and searchable on the web at: http://www.ieeecommunities.org/emc-pstc
